Through thousands of clinical experiments, it has been proven that magnetic therapy is safe, non-addictive, and there are no known harmful exposure levels. Clinical tests have proven that magnets reduce pain. Magnets deeply penetrate the flesh and create a magnetic field that energizes, alkalizes, and oxygenates the blood, improving the immune system performance and the body’s healing abilities.
Dr. Albert Roy Davis, Ph.D., noted the positive and negative magnetic polarities have different effects upon biological systems of animals. He found that magnets could be used to arrest and kill cancer cells in animals, and could also be used in the treatment of arthritis, glaucoma, infertility, and diseases related to aging. He concluded that negative magnetic fields have a beneficial effect on living organisms, whereas positive magnetic fields have a harmful effect.
According to Wolfgang Ludwig, Sc.D., Ph.D., Director of the Institute for Biophysics in Horb, Germany, “Magnetic field therapy is a method that penetrates the whole human body and can treat every organ without chemical side effects.
“Magnetic energy has a beneficial effect on blood circulation, lymph flow, hormone production, nerves and muscles,” says Dr. Ulrich Warnke, M.D., in “Magnets to Overcome Pain.”
“A negative magnetic field (north or negative side) can function like an antibiotic in helping to destroy bacterial, fungal, and viral infections,” says Dr. Philpott, “by promoting oxygenation and lowering the body’s acidity.” Both these factors are beneficial to normal bodily functions but harmful to pathogenic (disease-causing) microorganisms, which do not survive in a well oxygenated, alkaline environment. These two factors are why clinical studies have proven that magnets reduce pain.
Dr. Philpott theorizes that the biological value of oxygen is increased by the influence of a negative electromagnetic field, and that the field causes negatively charged DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) to “pull” oxygen out of the bloodstream and into the cell. The negative electromagnetic field keeps the cellular buffer system (pH or acid-based balance) intact so that the cells remain alkaline. The low acid balance also helps maintain the presence of oxygen in the body.
Dr. Philpott states: “A negative magnetic field normalizes the disturbed metabolic functions that cause painful conditions such as cellular edema (swelling of the cells), cellular acidosis (excessive acidity of the cells), lack of oxygen to the cells, and function. A positive magnetic field, on the other hand, can increase pain due to its interference with normal metabolic function.”
On my deathbed when pain got unbearable in an area of the colon, I used the north side of a 4″ x 5½” x ½” approximately 1000 gauss (magnet strength measurement) magnet against the area most all the time. By the end of the first week the pain started reducing and by the end of the month the pain had disappeared totally.
Today, 4000 gauss magnets are only an inch in size and weigh about an ounce. This type of magnet was especially designed for Professor Wollen and used on cancer patients – all successfully as mentioned in the article “Curing Cancer With Magnets” in Magnet In Your Future magazine.
(The following is a reprint from Magnets In Your Future magazine. April 1988. Reprinted with permission. A Z Printing Company, 4000 HWY 62, Hardy, Arkansas, U.S.A. 72542-9550, (870) 856-3041, FAX (870) 856-3590, Info. (870) 856-3164.)
(Editor’s Note: Summary of a 57 page Report presented by G. Wollin on November 20, 1987, at Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.) Excerpt taken from MAGNETS, Volume 3, Number 4, April 1988.)
“Mrs. Kerstin Westelius had lung cancer of the metastasis type. After years of surgery, therapy and chemotherapy, she was told in June 1987 by her physicians that her cancer was incurable and that she had only 2 more months to live. Here in the picture, she is shown in January of 1988 with her physician, Dr., Erik Enby, who treated her by hanging a Neomax supermagnet around her neck, and with Prof. Goesta Wollen of Clyde, N.C., who invented the method of treating cancer with the employment of supermagnets. Since July of 1987 more than 50 cancer patients in Sweden and America have been treated – all successfully.
“Because of the recent invention of a supermagnet with great strength and a minute size, three breast cancer patients have been cured by a method, which will revolutionize the field of cancer treatment. One of the patients had breast cancer of the metastasis type; that is, the cancer had transplanted into tissue distant from the site of the original cancer. The technique we used strongly indicates that all kinds of cancer can be cured by this method.
“The super energy permanent magnet we use in our project has a maximum energy of up to 35,000,000 gauss-oersteds. This strength of the supermagnet is the world’s record in commercial production, according to the prestigious American Journal “SCIENCE.” It is made of iron, boron and neodymium, one of the rare metals. It is brand-named Neomax.
“The Neomax supermagnet was recently -1983 – invented by the Sumitomo Special Metals Company of Japan. This company also commercially produces it.
“The size of the Neomax supermagnet that was used in the cancer project is approximately the size of an American quarter. It is smaller than a Swedish krona. It weights 30 grams, which is approximately 1 ounce.
“The supermagnets for Professor Wollin were made to his specifications. Professor Wollin received, as a generous gift, 30 Neomax supermagnets from the Sumitomo Special Metals Company of Japan. Each one of the women with breast cancer who participated in the project had a supermagnet hanging around her neck for about 4 months, with the north polarity of the magnet directed toward the body.
“The results indicate that our method can cure all types of cancer. If we had positioned the magnets on the tumor, we would not have known this. But since we hung a supermagnet around the neck of each patient, it indicates the supermagnets influence the whole body.
“Of importance is healthy tissue surrounding a cancer tumor is not harmed by a supermagnet because healthy cells have different electromagnetic potential than cancer cells.
“Of great importance is that we can suggest a mechanism; that is, what is happening when a supermagnet is trying to eliminate a malignant tumor. The mechanism is based on Wollin’s recent discovery of a universal spiral theory. Wollin discovered that spirals are found throughout nature, from the galaxies, each one consisting of hundreds of billions of stars, down to the basic shape of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid), the bodies’ ultimate genetic material. The miraculous molecule that makes a mouse a mouse or a human-being a human being. DNA exists in every chromosome in every cell of every individual.
“We propose that magnetism and cancer cells are spirals on different scales. When super magnetism is applied to cancer tumors, the magnetic spirals, being larger, are dominating, and at the end, kill the smaller cancer cell spirals.
“The successful result of our cancer treatment project is a consequence, of more, than 400 years of research in the fields of electromagnetotherapy and diseases.
“Electromagnetotherapy needs to be clarified because in the literature the term’s electrotherapy, magnetotherapy, etc., are used to describe the same process. We use only the term electromagnetotherapy because Maxwell showed that electricity and magnetism are two aspects of the same entity, electromagnetism.
“In a book chapter entitled “About Magnets and Their Wonderful Ability to Help in the Cure of All sorts of Diseases” by Paracelsus, he writes, for example, that he found the use of magnets to be of great value for the cure of epilepsy. He recommends that 4 magnets be placed on the stomach and 4 on the back.
“So far Nordenstrom has treated with electromagnetotherapy 80 patients with breast and lung cancer tumors. His treatment has regressed or killed the tumors in most of the 80 patients. Nordenstrom’s treatment of cancer tumors consists of inserting a long needle into the center of a tumor and another needle in normal tissue. The needles are platinum electrodes. The electrode in the tumor is positive and the other negative. Wires are hooked to both electrodes and are connected to a direct electric current processor. The electric current is turned on and is increased in successions from 0 to 10 volts. The treatment has begun.
“It is important that our method for curing cancer uses only one magnet. Before we started the project, described in this report, we surmised we needed two magnets – one on each side of the tumor. We succeeded in our treatment of cancer with one magnet because a human being is like a magnet. That humans are electromagnetic was suggested in 1926 by the eminent American surgeon and electromagnetotherapist George Crile in his book “A Bipolar Theory of Living Processes” and in 1983 by the eminent radiologist and cancer researcher Bjorn Nordenstrom in his book “Biological Electric Circuits: Clinical, Experimental and Theoretical Evidence for an additional Circular System”.
“It is very important we have developed a new method for curing cancer because cancer is increasing everywhere. For example: 1) In Japan there are more than 300,000 new cases of cancer each year; 2) In the United States the cancer mortality rate is increasing each year so that in 1986 cancer killed over 460,000 people; 3) In Sweden, during the last 20 years, there was an increase of 52% of cancer cases reported by the Swedish Socialstyrelsen on October 23, 1987.
“In summary, when someone has cancer, in general there are three ways of trying to eliminate the malignant tumor from the body. Surgery is one possibility. Another possibility is to kill the cancerous cells with radiation; that is, radiotherapy, which, of course, also is electromagnetotherapy. The third option is to kill the cancerous cells with drugs; that is, chemotherapy. The drawback with these treatments is that they damage healthy cells, too.
“We suggest another option: electromagnetotherapy with the employment of supermagnets. This type of treatment does not damage healthy cells because healthy cells have different electromagnetic potential than cancer cells. It is a new approach to the treatment of cancer, the first since chemotherapy began more than 40 years ago.”
In Discovery of Magnetic Health by George J. Washnis and Richard Z. Hricak quote Robert Barefoot, a bio-chemist who deals with nutrition and disease, as follows: “The loss of energy from natural magnetic fields means that cellular calcium is not maintained in an active ionized state and so reverts to its inert molecular state and is deposited as a solid substance on cells. The benefit of magnetotherapy is the ability of its magnetic fields to raise pH and thereby ionize the calcium, converting it into biologically active calcium ions.”
State-of-the-art equipment utilizing magnetic technology currently exists in Europe, where magnetic therapy is an established method in many hospitals and doctors’ offices.
Curing cancer with magnets; a case study
Patient: Norma Redman.
Diagnosis: Undifferentiated small cell (Oatcell) carcinoma – lung cancer.
Medical History: Little or no health problems until present illness.
Miscellaneous: Patient smoked two or three packs of cigarettes per day for fifty years.
In August of 1986, the patient developed a severe cough and experienced difficulty in breathing. She visited her doctor and he diagnosed her as having pneumonia and he admitted her to the hospital. After further testing – C.A.T scans and x-rays – she was diagnosed as having small cell carcinoma. A broncoscophy confirmed the diagnosis.
In September 1986, chemotherapy was begun. Chemotherapy continued until April 1987. Then she was given ten days of cobalt radiation directed at the brain. This treatment is necessary because conventional chemotherapy will not kill cancer cells of the Oatcell type in the brain. Chemotherapy was reinstated through late November and early December 1987.
In December 1987, one of her doctors told her she had about one month to live and that they had done all they could for her. At this time, she was experiencing severe back pain and the doctors determined the cancer had moved into her spine. She was given radiation (5 days) and one more round of chemotherapy. At that point she was told that any additional treatment would be of little or no value. On December 23, 1987, she was released from the hospital.
I visited the patient on December 25, 1987. Her condition was as follows:
a. Mental confusion. Could not remember things told to her longer that five minutes.
b. Patient was in severe pain.
c. Patient was on pain medication (Percoset), 2 tablets every 3 hours.
d. Patient could not stand or walk, aided or unaided.
e. Patient could not sleep through the night. Would awaken several times during the night and require assistance.
f. Patient was depressed and exhibited child-like mannerisms.
The “Neomax” was placed on the patient with the north polarity toward the body. After two days had passed, the patient was only taking one pain tablet in the morning and one at night. The mental confusion was noticeably absent and the patient stated that she had slept uninterrupted from 9:00 p.m. to 6:30 a.m. the next day.
I visited the patient on January 2, 1988. She told me she had been sleeping well every night, not awakening at all during the night. She was taking very little pain medicine. Her back was still hurting when she moved. But she stated it was more tolerable.
On January 5, 1988, the patient was moved to a skilled care nursing home. The doctors there conferred with her oncologist about her condition. On Wednesday, January 6, 1988, the patient told me she had no pain medication that day and that twice that day she had walked (aided) to the bathroom. Also, the resident doctor told her that they determined by studying x-rays, C.A.T. scans, and by other means, that she did not have any cancer in her spine. Instead, they thought her back pain was being caused by osteoporosis. Further, they told her that all tests they performed on her showed no trace of any cancer.
I talked with the patient on Friday, January 8, 1988. Her mental condition was excellent. She stated that she was taking very little pain medication and was in less pain than previous conversations. She has been wearing the super magnet, as of this writing, for fourteen days and has made remarkable progress in so short a period of time. I visited the patient on January 9, 1988. She was able to sit up in bed by herself, could sit on the side of the bed by herself, and could walk, unaided, to the bathroom by herself, although I walked along beside her just to be on the safe side. She is presently taking little or no pain medication, and no other drugs. Her appetite is not very good, but it is improving daily. I expect to visit her again at the end of January and I will be in contact with her by phone almost on a daily basis.
I will continue to monitor and report on her condition until she has fully recovered.
Douglas M. Redman